Corporate Action Changes: FINRA Rule 6490
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, made key changes in the way corporate actions are handled this past year, including eliminating time-consuming paperwork and adding issuer fees for corporate action processing.
As far as paper elimination is concerned, FINRA has created interactive PDF documents for both issuers and transfer agents involved in the corporate action process. A simple, consolidated form is available from FINRA’s website for issuers, getting rid of much paperwork and saving issuers time.
They will not, however, be saving issuers money. Effective September 27, 2010, the SEC approved Rule 6490 in relation to FINRA’s processing corporate actions for unlisted securities. Under this rule, FINRA is authorized to charge issuers processing fees for corporate actions. If the 10b-17 notice is filed within ten calendar days prior to the corporate action date the fees are not extreme, but late filing fees will accumulate for issuers who don’t comply with the rule.
Also under rule 6490, FINRA’s Department of Operations now has authority to examine the legitimacy of corporate action requests. FINRA is authorized to use their discretionary power to reject questionable notices. FINRA has given five factors that may cause a corporate action request to be rejected:
- 1. Forms and documents are incomplete, inaccurate, or without proper authority.
- 2. The issuer is not current in their filings
- 3. Parties related to the action are subject to regulatory, civil, or criminal action related to securities law violations or fraud
- 4. Parties related to the action are involved in fraudulent activities or activities that pose a threat to public investors.
- 5. “There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security.” (Abandoned or neglected shells revived and presented to FINRA for a reverse merger could have difficulty going through the corporate action process if clean shareholder records are not available.)
If a notice is rejected, the issuer can appeal the decision within seven days. Three members of FINRA’s UPC Committee will evaluate an appeal request for a non-refundable fee of $4000.
Though issuers may not be too happy with FINRA'S new claim to power and rising costs, these changes have been made with the goal of preventing fraud in the marketplace. With feedback from issuers, this coming year will show the effectiveness of these new policies.
Published: September 27, 2010
Author: Kassidy Mather
Recent Featured Articles
- House of Representatives Passes Accelerated Access to Capital Act
- Dodd-Frank Rollback Bill Clears House Committee
- DTC Rule Change: Deposit Chills and Global Locks
- New SEC Rules for Intrastate Crowdfunding
- SEC Meets Small and Emerging Companies
- What is DTC Eligibility?
- Selecting a Crowdfunding Transfer Agent
- IEX - A New National Stock Exchange
- OTCQX Rules Release Number 11
- Funding Portal Guide for Title III Crowdfunding
- Company Guide for Title III Crowdfunding
- H.R. 3784 - SEC Small Business Advocate Act
- H.R. 2187 - Fair Investment Opportunities
- H.R. 1675 - Capital Markets Improvement Act
- SEC FAST Act with Revisions to Forms S-1, F-1
- DTC CUSIP Eligibility Fee on Corporate Actions
- SEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
- OTCQB Allows Regulation A Listing
- Proposed Rule on Executive Compensation
- SEC Issues Final Rules on Regulation A+
- What Issuers Can Expect from Crowdfunding
- SEC Issues Proposal on Crowdfunding
- Side-by-Side Analysis of XBRL
- The Lesson's of Citigroup's Say on Pay Loss
- STA Rebutes NYSE on Proxy Fee Increases
- Impact of the XBRL Limited Liability Expiration
- XBRL HR 37 Exemption Rejected
- 5 Tips on XBRL Compliance